A software team is preparing a trial build to evaluate new features in a pre-production environment. They are concerned that customer data could be inadvertently exposed during testing. Which approach best reduces the risk of disclosing sensitive records?
Create artificial entries to mimic real scenarios without storing personal fields
Import live operational data without modifications
Grant administrative permissions to the trial team
Mark real entries as restricted but keep their actual values
Using synthetic or masked data allows teams to simulate real-world functionality without involving personally identifiable information (PII) or sensitive business content. This minimizes the risk of unauthorized disclosure while maintaining accurate test coverage. Importing actual customer records—even for internal use—poses legal, regulatory, and reputational risks. Marking sensitive entries as restricted is not a safeguard against backend exposure, and administrative access increases the likelihood of accidental data leakage. Industry standards such as NIST SP 800-53 and OWASP Testing Guide endorse data anonymization or synthetic generation for non-production testing to ensure compliance and reduce risk vectors.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is synthetic data, and why is it used in testing?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is using live operational data risky in a pre-production environment?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some standards that recommend data anonymization for testing?