A team wants a minimal text-based format for storing security automation settings. They want to reduce mistakes that happen when adjusting alignment or placing extra spaces. Which explanation best describes why their chosen approach reduces confusion for administrators who share these files across different systems?
It depends on distinct tags for every value, making certain each parameter is granted a fixed label
It uses a layout that avoids complicated spacing or explicit tagging, simplifying file edits
It adopts a layered indentation style that keeps settings precisely separated
It encodes all content in non-human-readable form to prevent manual tampering
This style does not rely on specialized tagging or intricate spacing rules, so it remains simpler to modify and interpret across various scenarios. The option mentioning indentation is susceptible to spacing errors if different text editors shift padding. The one describing a binary structure is not user-friendly and cannot be easily audited. The tag-heavy answer inflates complexity and can lead to lengthy configurations.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What minimal text-based format is commonly used for storing security automation settings?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is indentation spacing a problem in some file formats?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does avoiding explicit tagging simplify file edits?