An enterprise wants to limit remote sign-ins to an approved zone and prompt for an additional action when a user tries connecting from outside that zone. Which measure aligns best with this requirement?
Have users manually declare their location at sign-in
Block all remote connections after designated work hours in the intended zone
Implement a rule that compares each sign-in attempt against an auto-updating IP registry and requires an extra challenge for unrecognized entries
Prompt the user’s mobile device to report its GPS coordinates before allowing access
Using a regularly updated IP reference for territorial rules identifies whether a sign-in originates from an approved zone. Implementing a dynamically updated IP rule that triggers extra verification outside approved regions is more robust than manual location input, time-only checks, or relying on a phone’s reported coordinates. The others are less reliable or do not specifically enforce authentication controls based on a user’s sign-in origin.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is an auto-updating IP registry?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is using an IP-based method more reliable than GPS or manual location input?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What additional challenge could be triggered for unrecognized IP entries?