An online retailer’s security team has observed specialized attacks on its network. The manager proposes joining a membership-based group that focuses on sharing critical data regarding adversary methods with organizations in the same sector. Which approach is most effective for gathering targeted alerts and tactical guidance to improve defenses?
Engage an external monitoring provider for threat detection services
Collaborate with a sector-specific membership group that provides intelligence reports
Implement an enterprise honeynet for collecting adversary tactics on the internal network
Rely on publicly available data portals for broad threat feeds
Collaborating with a group that shares tailored intelligence is the most beneficial because it focuses on threats relevant to the specific operational environment. Other methods propose valuable controls but do not provide the same level of direct threat insight or collaboration among similar entities. A publicly available feed is broader in scope, not always offering the specialized intelligence needed. A honeynet can reveal adversary techniques on a single network, but it does not facilitate knowledge exchange with peers. Outsourced monitoring can provide services but might not integrate industry-specific threat data in the same collaborative way.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a sector-specific membership group?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does tailored intelligence improve network defenses?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is collaborating with peers better than using publicly available data?