An organization adds new features that block suspicious connections near crucial points. Which approach is the best way to confirm these features remain effective as circumstances evolve?
Use user feedback to identify issues with the new protective features
Increase server capacity to handle incoming traffic
Periodically review and test protective features in diverse environments
Conduct a yearly design review and inspection before the new fiscal year
Periodic evaluations simulate diverse attack scenarios and operational conditions, allowing teams to measure the protective features' real-world effectiveness. Passive approaches like yearly reviews or relying solely on user complaints fail to catch silent failures. Increased capacity improves performance but does not confirm defensive effectiveness.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is periodic testing considered a better approach than yearly reviews?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What types of diverse environments should be included in periodic reviews?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How can teams simulate real-world attack scenarios effectively during testing?