During a software release, a development team needs to reassure everyone that the final build is published by the recognized group and has not been altered. Which approach is best for enabling that confirmation?
Generate random checksums to scramble the app logic prior to release
Rotate ephemeral encryption keys for internal repository transfers
Conceal vital code sections by renaming methods and data references
Add cryptographically attached certificates validated by recognized keys
Attaching cryptographic credentials with the release helps recipients confirm that the build came from a trusted publisher and was not tampered with. This technique uses a recognized authority to verify authenticity. Obscuring code, randomizing file structures, or rotating ephemeral keys might secure data differently, but they do not confirm the origin or protect the integrity of distributed software in the same way.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a cryptographically attached certificate?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do recognized keys authenticate software releases?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are other approaches, like randomizing checksums, insufficient for software integrity?