A large financial institution's security team is considering implementing various threat intelligence feeds to enhance their security posture. Which of the following statements about commercially sourced threat feeds is most accurate?
Commercial threat feeds are updated more frequently than open-source or government-provided intelligence.
Commercial threat feeds provide broader coverage of threats across various industries compared to government or industry-specific feeds.
Commercial threat feeds are less expensive than other sources but require more in-house analysis before implementation.
Commercial threat feeds typically provide more contextual and actionable intelligence but at a higher cost compared to open-source alternatives.
Commercially sourced threat feeds provide curated, analyzed intelligence that has been vetted by security analysts. They include context around threats (indicators, TTPs, impact assessments) and typically contain fewer false positives than open-source alternatives. While more expensive, their main advantage is providing actionable intelligence that requires less in-house validation before implementation. The incorrect answers misrepresent cost factors (commercial feeds are more expensive, not less), coverage capabilities (some specialized feeds may have unique visibility in certain areas), and update frequency (which varies across all feed types).
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are TTPs in threat intelligence?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the advantages of using commercial threat feeds?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do open-source threat feeds differ from commercial feeds?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
ISC2 CISSP
Security Operations
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
IT & Cybersecurity Package Join Premium for Full Access