What issue may cybersecurity analysts face when reporting on vulnerabilities within a proprietary system that differentiates it from reporting on open-source systems?
Increased speed of patch deployment in proprietary systems reduces the necessity for thorough documentation in reports.
The ability to freely customize proprietary system components makes vulnerability reporting for these systems more straightforward.
The open-source community support for proprietary systems ensures vulnerabilities are addressed faster than in open-source systems.
Dependency on the vendor for patch releases can delay remediation and must be documented as part of the mitigation strategy in reports.
The correct answer highlights the dependency on the vendor for security updates and the unavailability of direct patch application or code modification by the organization's internal team. Unlike open-source systems, where the community can contribute to solutions and patches can be directly applied, proprietary systems often lock down code access, making mitigation contingent on vendor support and release schedules.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does it mean for a system to be proprietary?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do patch release cycles differ between proprietary and open-source systems?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is vendor support critical for addressing vulnerabilities in proprietary systems?