A developer on a team is creating a new pipeline for code changes. Each commit triggers a test suite, container build, and a final manual check. Which arrangement is suited to maintain a structured workflow that merges stable changes after checks pass?
Adopt a separate repository for tests and run them outside the pipeline, merging the code without dependency on the pipeline.
Use sequential steps that run tests, build containers, and prompt for manual confirmation before merging.
Place all steps in a single script that runs local checks but merges code after running checks.
Create a branching model that integrates code based on team-defined intervals to reduce repeated runs.
Placing tests and container builds in a pipeline before the final manual confirmation provides a high degree of validation. It helps detect code defects early and ensures an operator can block changes that are not ready. Other methods either merge code at less organized intervals, lump everything in a single script that may not handle complex steps thoroughly, or rely on separate repositories which can miss critical testing steps.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is a structured pipeline with sequential steps better than merging code at intervals?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the purpose of the final manual confirmation step in the pipeline?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why might using a separate repository for tests not be ideal in a pipeline setup?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
CompTIA Cloud+ CV0-004
DevOps Fundamentals
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
IT & Cybersecurity Package Join Premium for Full Access