A software team building microservices is encountering unpredictable issues after new code merges. They want to prevent broken changes from reaching production. Which approach helps them confirm that recent modifications preserve the application's main functions and do not cause new errors?
Automated functional checks integrated into the pipeline
Periodic merges every two weeks
Regular ephemeral environment deployments for manual inspections
Deploying new code after a sign-off from the lead developer
Automated functional checks in the pipeline ensure that each change is validated against a recurring baseline, catching problems early. Regular ephemeral environment deployments hinge heavily on manual inspection, which may overlook subtle issues. Periodic merges every two weeks allow problematic changes to accumulate without prompt detection. A sign-off from a lead developer provides oversight but not guaranteed verification for complex scenarios.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are automated functional checks in a pipeline?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the advantages of automated tests compared to manual inspections?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are periodic merges or manual sign-offs less effective for catching errors early?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
CompTIA Cloud+ CV0-004
DevOps Fundamentals
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
IT & Cybersecurity Package Join Premium for Full Access