A company experienced a data breach after failing to patch a known vulnerability for six months. During litigation, they would most likely be found to have failed which of the following?
Due care refers to taking reasonable steps that a prudent person would take in a given situation to prevent harm or meet obligations. In this scenario, the company failed to apply a patch for a known vulnerability for an extended period (six months), which represents a failure to exercise due care. This demonstrates a lack of reasonable action to protect systems and data, which a prudent organization would typically address in a more timely manner.
Due diligence, in contrast, refers to the investigation and research process undertaken before making decisions or taking actions, such as assessing risks before implementing systems. The scenario specifically shows a failure to act on known information rather than a failure to investigate.
The other options are incorrect because: code of ethics violations typically involve professional conduct issues, not security maintenance practices; and the business impact analysis is a process for determining critical business functions and is not directly related to patch management failures.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does due care mean in cybersecurity?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the difference between due care and due diligence?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is patch management important in cybersecurity?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
ISC2 CISSP
Security and Risk Management
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
IT & Cybersecurity Package Join Premium for Full Access