A medical assistant discusses confidential patient information with a friend over lunch in a public setting. The information disclosed leads to the patient's public embarrassment and mental anguish. The patient files a lawsuit. Under which doctrine could the medical practice also potentially be held liable for the medical assistant's breach of confidentiality?
The doctrine of 'respondeat superior' holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment. In this case, discussing confidential patient information is part of the medical assistant's job, though it should not be disclosed publicly. Despite this being an improper action, it could fall under the scope of employment as it relates to the assistant's work-related duties. 'Subpoena duces tecum' pertains to a court order requiring documents to be produced, which is not directly relevant to the employer's responsibility for the employee's actions. The 'Good Samaritan laws' protect individuals who provide aid in an emergency situation, which doesn't apply to this scenario. 'Respondeat superior' is different from 'negligence' on its own, because negligence refers to the individual's failure to exercise reasonable care, whereas 'respondeat superior' relates to the employer's liability for such negligence.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the respondeat superior doctrine?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the implications of breaching patient confidentiality?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does negligence differ from respondeat superior in legal terms?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
AAMA CMA
General
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Nursing and Medical Assistants Package Join Premium for Full Access