Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Question
Attorney Jordan previously represented Alpha Corp in negotiating a merger. Now, Alpha Corp's competitor, Beta Inc., seeks Attorney Jordan's representation in negotiating a merger against Alpha Corp. What is the most appropriate action for Attorney Jordan to take?
Under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically Rule 1.9, a lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter cannot represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter if that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client, unless the former client gives informed consent. Since Beta Inc. is a direct competitor and the matters are substantially related, Attorney Jordan must decline representation to avoid a conflict of interest.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is Rule 1.9 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does 'informed consent' mean in this context?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What constitutes a 'substantially related matter'?