Crucial Exams

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Question

Attorney Paige is defending a client in a high-profile assault case. During a press event, she accuses the plaintiff of fabrication and reveals records from a sealed file that reflect poorly on the plaintiff. The prosecutor states that Paige’s comments can sway potential jurors. Is she subject to discipline?

  • All publicly addressed remarks are avenues for potential discipline.

  • Her remarks create a basis for discipline because sharing confidential details can skew the fairness of the process

  • She avoids discipline for using media channels in highlighting the plaintiff’s credibility issues

  • She avoids censure because her commentary covers matters unrelated to the evidentiary analysis

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam
Litigation and other forms of advocacy
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot