Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Question
Sasha, an attorney, meets with Jordan to evaluate a potential real estate lawsuit. Jordan provides strategic financial details but does not proceed with an engagement. A month later, the opposing party in Jordan’s possible case contacts Sasha about representation in the same dispute. Which statement aligns with the professional conduct rules?
Sasha may proceed because an attorney-client relationship was not formally established
Call the ethics hotline.
Sasha may choose not to represent the new client if the shared details are significantly harmful to Jordan
Sasha can represent the new client provided that the prior consultation details are disclosed
A prospective client’s confidential information imposes obligations similar to those owed an existing client. If the details would be significantly harmful to the prospective client, the lawyer should limit or avoid representing an adverse party in that same or a related matter. The other statements either overlook these protective duties or wrongly suggest disclosing confidential details without effective consent.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the obligations an attorney has toward a prospective client?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does it mean for information to be significantly harmful?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the key differences between representation of a prospective client and an existing client?