A delivery driver employed by FastGoods Inc. is making a delivery during his work hours. While using his smartphone, he runs a red light and strikes a pedestrian, causing serious injuries. Can FastGoods Inc. be held liable for the driver's actions under vicarious liability principles?
No, because the driver was using his smartphone at the time of the accident.
No, because the incident was not authorized by the employer.
Yes, because the driver was acting within the scope of his employment.
Yes, if FastGoods Inc. had a policy against smartphone use.
FastGoods Inc. is liable because the driver was acting within the scope of his employment when the accident occurred. Vicarious liability holds employers responsible for the torts committed by their employees during their employment. The driver's use of his smartphone does not absolve the employer since the negligent act occurred while performing job duties. Other options incorrectly suggest that personal negligence, company policies, or lack of authorization negate employer liability.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is vicarious liability?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does it mean for an employee to be acting within the scope of employment?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do employers protect themselves from vicarious liability?