The correct answer is false. Misrepresentation in contract law does not always require an intentional act. A statement can constitute actionable misrepresentation if it was made negligently (when the party fails to exercise reasonable care in verifying the truth of the statement) or even innocently (when the party honestly but mistakenly believes the statement to be true). Fraudulent misrepresentation specifically requires intentional deceit and allows for both rescission of the contract and possible damages. The incorrect assumption that all misrepresentation requires intent disregards the broader circumstances under which a false statement may still significantly impact a contract’s enforceability.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What constitutes negligent misrepresentation in contract law?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can you explain what innocent misrepresentation is?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the remedies available for misrepresentation in a contract?