A graphic design company entered into a contract with a restaurant to rebrand its logo and produce marketing materials. Midway through the project, the restaurant informed the company it would no longer need its services due to budget cuts. Despite being notified, the company completed the design work and demanded payment under the contract. The restaurant refused, arguing that the company failed to act reasonably after it canceled the contract. Under principles of contract law regarding the duty to mitigate damages, how should the court likely rule?
The restaurant is not liable for damages because the cancellation eliminated the restaurant's further obligations under the contract.
The court will limit the company's recovery to the costs and expenses it incurred before being notified of the cancellation.
The company is entitled to payment for work completed prior to the notification of the cancellation.
The company is entitled to payment unless the restaurant demonstrates it had a legal defense for canceling the contract.
The non-breaching party has a legal obligation to mitigate damages by taking reasonable steps to avoid unnecessary losses when it is clear that the other party will not fulfill its obligations. In this case, the graphic design company was notified that the restaurant would no longer require its services. Continuing with the work after this notification was not reasonable, as the company knew, or should have known, that its additional expenses would not be recoverable. The incorrect answers misstate or oversimplify the mitigation doctrine, ignore the relevance of notice given by the restaurant, or misunderstand the application of the principle that only reasonable costs are recoverable after a breach.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does it mean to mitigate damages in contract law?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the typical factors a court considers in assessing reasonable steps to mitigate damages?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the potential outcomes for the graphic design company in this scenario?