A homeowner discussed renovations with a contractor. The homeowner verbally agreed that the contractor should replace the roof for $25,000 and start immediately. Relying on this agreement, the contractor purchased materials and rented equipment, spending $7,000. Before work began, the homeowner decided to cancel the project, citing financial troubles. The contractor sues the homeowner seeking restitution or reliance damages for the costs incurred. Which of the following is the best solution for addressing the contractor's claim?
The contractor is entitled to $7,000 in reliance damages, representing the costs incurred due to reliance on the homeowner's promise.
The contractor is entitled to $25,000 in expectation damages, representing the profit they would have made under the contract.
The contractor is not entitled to any damages because the agreement was not in writing and does not constitute an enforceable contract.
The contractor may recover restitution for the homeowner’s unjust enrichment, but since the homeowner has received no benefit, no damages can be awarded.
The correct answer is appropriate because courts may award damages based on reliance interest to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the agreement not been made – particularly when the injured party incurred expenses relying on the other party's promise. Expectation damages are typically awarded when a valid and enforceable contract exists, but in this scenario, there may not be sufficient basis for such enforcement since this agreement may not meet the legal requirements for a binding contract. The other options are incorrect because they fail to consider the contractor's out-of-pocket costs or misapply the concepts of reliance or restitution.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are reliance damages and how do they differ from expectation damages?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the significance of verbal agreements in contract law?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is unjust enrichment and how does it apply to this scenario?