A man discovers his spouse with another individual and fatally attacks them in a fit of rage. Charged with homicide, the man seeks mitigation to voluntary manslaughter on the grounds of provocation. In which scenario is provocation most likely to reduce the charge?
Finding out about a spouse's infidelity weeks later and attacking the individual.
Becoming angry after being insulted.
Seeing a spouse engaged in adultery.
Hearing a rumor about a spouse’s infidelity and confronting and attacking the suspected individual.
The correct answer aligns with the legal recognition that discovering a spouse in the act of adultery constitutes sufficient provocation to arouse intense emotion in an ordinary person, reducing culpability to voluntary manslaughter. Other scenarios fail to meet the criteria because the provocation is either insufficiently immediate to qualify as 'heat of passion' (e.g., finding out weeks later) or involves factors—such as rumors or minor insults—that courts regard as inadequate to incite a reasonable person to lose self-control.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What constitutes sufficient provocation in legal terms?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do courts define 'heat of passion'?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are rumors or delayed information inadequate for provocation claims?