This statement is true. A mistake of fact is a valid defense if it directly negates the mental state (mens rea) required for the crime. For instance, if a crime requires specific intent and the defendant's mistaken belief prevents them from forming that intent, the defense is valid. However, for strict liability crimes that do not require proof of intent, mistake of fact is not a defense.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is mens rea, and why is it important in criminal law?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are strict liability crimes, and how do they differ from other crimes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can a mistake of law ever serve as a defense in criminal cases?