This statement is true. Strict liability crimes do not require the prosecution to prove the defendant's mental state (mens rea). The commission of the act itself is sufficient for conviction, regardless of intent or knowledge. These offenses are often regulatory in nature and aim to ensure public safety, such as traffic violations or selling expired food. Any argument requiring evidence of intent or knowledge misapplies the principle of strict liability.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are strict liability crimes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can you give examples of strict liability crimes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is mens rea and how does it relate to strict liability?