A recently passed federal law grants Congress the authority to hold ownership stakes in private businesses that produce goods deemed ‘critical to national security.’ A private technology company with no history of government contracts or direct involvement in defense supply challenges this law. The company argues that Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution by enacting this legislation. Does Congress have the constitutional authority to enact such legislation?
No, Congress cannot enact laws that regulate businesses lacking a constitutional basis for such authority.
Yes, Congress possesses the implied power to act under the Necessary and Proper Clause to protect national security.
Yes, Congress may regulate certain private businesses when justified under its commerce power authorization.
No, this law violates the separation of powers by improperly delegating authority to private companies.
Congress has the implied power to legislate in areas that ensure the fulfillment of its general constitutional responsibilities, such as national security. The Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress the flexibility to enact laws necessary to carry out its enumerated powers, which include national defense and general welfare. The law's focus on goods critical to national security establishes a clear link to these constitutional powers. Other answers are incorrect because they either fail to recognize the link between national security and Congressional authority or mischaracterize the scope of Congress’s commerce power.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the Necessary and Proper Clause?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does Congress's power tie into national security?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What distinguishes implied powers from enumerated powers?