A restaurant owner hired a contractor to remodel the kitchen. During the work, the contractor left several tools scattered on the floor, creating a tripping hazard. Despite noticing the tools, the restaurant owner hurried across the kitchen to retrieve a ringing phone and tripped on one of the tools, breaking their arm. The restaurant owner sued the contractor, claiming negligence. At trial, evidence showed that the restaurant owner was 40% at fault for not avoiding the tools, while the contractor was found to be 60% at fault for carelessly leaving the tools on the floor. The jurisdiction follows a modified comparative negligence rule where a plaintiff may recover damages only if their fault does not exceed 50%. Which of the following best describes the restaurant owner's ability to recover damages?
The restaurant owner cannot recover because their fault exceeds the threshold allowed in a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction.
The restaurant owner cannot recover damages because they were partially at fault for the accident.
The restaurant owner can recover damages because the contractor created the hazardous condition.
The restaurant owner can recover damages from the contractor, but the amount will be reduced by 40%.
Under a modified comparative negligence rule with a 50% threshold, a plaintiff may recover damages as long as their fault does not exceed 50% of the total fault. Since the restaurant owner is 40% at fault and the contractor is 60% at fault, the restaurant owner's fault is less than the threshold. Therefore, the restaurant owner can recover damages, but the amount awarded will be reduced by their percentage of fault. In this case, the restaurant owner would recover 60% of the damages. The incorrect options misunderstand the threshold requirement for recovery under modified comparative negligence or fail to account for the reduction in damages based on the plaintiff's degree of fault.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is modified comparative negligence and how does it work?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How is fault determined in a negligence case?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does it mean for the restaurant owner to recover 60% of the damages?