Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

A software developer verbally promised a start-up company free use of her custom accounting software for the first six months to assist with their launch. Relying on this promise, the start-up hired an accounting team and invested in training them on the software. Two weeks after the training, the developer decided not to provide the software, stating that no binding agreement existed because the start-up had not provided consideration. The start-up claims it incurred significant costs based on the developer's promise. Can the developer's promise be enforced despite the absence of a bargained-for exchange?

  • No, the promise is not enforceable because it was not in writing and therefore does not meet statutory requirements.

  • Yes, the promise is enforceable because the start-up relied on it to their detriment.

  • Yes, the promise is enforceable because the software developer received a tangible benefit, thereby creating a restitution interest.

  • No, the promise is not enforceable because there was no consideration exchanged between the developer and the start-up.

Multistate Bar Examination
Contracts
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot