A state legislature passes a law prohibiting any advertisements that criticize the state's environmental policies, while allowing advertisements on other topics. Which of the following best describes the constitutionality of this law under the First Amendment?
The law is unconstitutional because it is a content-based restriction that fails strict scrutiny.
The law is constitutional if it serves a legitimate government interest in regulating speech content.
The law is unconstitutional unless it is the least restrictive means to achieve the state's interest.
The law is constitutional as it regulates the time, place, and manner of advertisements.
The law constitutes a content-based regulation of speech, which triggers strict scrutiny. The state must demonstrate a compelling interest and that the law is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. Unless the state can show that the prohibition on criticizing environmental policies serves a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means available, the law is unconstitutional.
Option A suggests that any content-based regulation can be justified if it serves a government interest, but without specifying the need for compelling interest and narrow tailoring, this is incomplete.
Option B correctly identifies the law as subject to strict scrutiny and recognizes that the state's justification must meet a high standard, making it the best answer.
Option C implies that any restriction on speech is unconstitutional, disregarding circumstances where the state might have a legitimate, compelling interest.
Option D incorrectly categorizes the regulation as a time, place, and manner restriction, which does not consider the content-based nature of the law.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is strict scrutiny in the context of First Amendment cases?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What qualifies as a content-based regulation of speech?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does 'narrowly tailored' mean in legal terms?