A store owner notices a customer attempting to steal an expensive item from a shelf. The store owner quickly locks the customer in a small back room to prevent them from escaping before law enforcement arrives. The customer sues the store owner for false imprisonment. What is the store owner's strongest defense?
The store owner acted in self-defense.
The store owner is immune from liability because the customer committed a crime.
The store owner's actions were necessary to prevent an emergency.
The store owner has a privilege to protect their property.
The correct answer is that the store owner's strongest defense is a privilege to protect their property. Under tort law, a person is privileged to take reasonable actions to protect their property, including detaining individuals they reasonably suspect of theft. However, this privilege is limited and requires that the detention be conducted in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time. Other options, such as necessity or self-defense, are invalid here because the situation involves protection of property rather than immediate harm to persons. Any excessiveness in the store owner's actions may negate the privilege.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does it mean to have a privilege to protect property?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the limits to a store owner's privilege to detain a suspected thief?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are defenses like necessity or self-defense invalid in this situation involving property theft?