A teenager attended a party at a neighbor's house. At the party, she consumed alcohol provided by the host, who knew she was underage. After leaving the party, the teenager caused a car accident that injured another driver. The injured driver sued the party host, claiming that the host had a duty to prevent the teenager from causing harm. Which of the following is the BEST explanation for whether the host had a duty in this situation?
The host had a duty to prevent harm because providing alcohol to a minor created a foreseeable risk of harm to third parties.
The host had no duty to prevent harm because social hosts are typically not responsible for the actions of their guests.
The host had no duty to prevent harm because the teenager's decision to drive was an intervening act relieving the host of liability.
The host had a duty to prevent harm if physical force was used to ensure the teenager consumed alcohol.
The correct answer is based on the principle that a duty to prevent harm caused by a third party may arise when the defendant created the risk or had a special relationship with the third party. Social hosts who serve alcohol to a minor create a foreseeable risk of harm that may extend to third parties injured as a result. The incorrect answers fail to reconcile this foreseeable risk with the scope of duty. For example, one incorrect answer mistakenly asserts social hosts typically lack responsibility, but this is not accurate in circumstances involving underage drinking. Another incorrect answer introduces irrelevant considerations, such as the use of physical force, which is not necessary to establish a duty in this case.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the legal definition of a duty in negligence cases?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does foreseeable risk mean in a legal context?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do intervening acts affect liability in negligence cases?