Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

During a criminal trial, the defense seeks to introduce evidence that the prosecution witness previously made a conflicting statement to impeach their credibility. The prosecution objects, arguing that the witness's prior statement is relevant to the truth of the matter asserted in the current case. Under the rules of evidence, how should the court handle the admission of the prior statement?

  • Exclude the prior statement as it is hearsay and irrelevant to the current case.

  • Admit the prior statement for impeaching the witness's credibility, but not for proving the truth of the matter asserted.

  • Admit the prior statement to both impeach the witness's credibility and to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

  • Admit the prior statement if the defense can demonstrate its reliability and relevance to the case.

Multistate Bar Examination
Evidence
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot