During a jury trial in a federal court proceeding, the plaintiff finishes presenting their evidence. The defense attorney believes that the plaintiff has failed to establish a legally sufficient basis for their claim. What is the most appropriate motion for the defense to file at this stage of the trial?
The correct motion at this point is a motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). Under Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this motion allows a party to argue that the opposing party has insufficient evidence to support their claim or defense. This motion is appropriate because it is made before the case is submitted to the jury. Other options, such as a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, are procedurally inappropriate at this stage, as they come only after a jury verdict.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL)?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
When can a motion for summary judgment be filed?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for judgment as a matter of law?