During her trial for embezzlement, the prosecution presents evidence that strongly suggests Sarah diverted company funds for personal use. Sarah claims that the transactions were authorized by her supervisor. What standard must the prosecution meet to secure a conviction against Sarah?
In criminal cases, the prosecution is required to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This highest standard of proof ensures that there is no reasonable uncertainty about the defendant's culpability before a conviction can be secured.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'beyond a reasonable doubt' mean in a legal context?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the standard of proof differ between civil and criminal cases?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What kinds of evidence are typically required to meet the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard?