Emily agrees to purchase a custom-built website from TechSolutions, with the contract stating that the payment will be made only after the website passes a UAT defined in the agreement. TechSolutions delivers the website, but Emily refuses to pay, claiming the website does not meet her expectations despite passing the agreed-upon test.
TechSolutions must refund any payments since a condition was involved.
The contract is void because conditions were involved.
Emily must pay TechSolutions because the website met the condition set forth in the contract.
Emily can refuse to pay because the website does not meet her expectations beyond the test.
The contract included an express condition that payment is contingent upon the website passing the UAT. Since the website met this condition, Emily is obligated to pay TechSolutions. Her additional expectations beyond the test are not covered by the contract terms.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is UAT and why is it important in contracts?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are express conditions in a contract?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do additional expectations beyond a contract affect obligations?