GreenTech Solutions, an out-of-state company based in State A, offers consumer electronics through an online platform accessible nationwide. A resident of State B purchases one of GreenTech’s products, which malfunctions and results in property damage. The consumer files a lawsuit in State B's court against GreenTech Solutions. GreenTech Solutions has no physical offices, employees, or inventory in State B but conducts sales to customers in State B regularly through its website. Can the courts in State B assert personal jurisdiction over GreenTech Solutions?
No, unless GreenTech Solutions has a principal place of business in State B.
Yes, if GreenTech Solutions specifically marketed its products to consumers in State B.
Yes, because GreenTech Solutions' routine business engagements with residents of State B constitute sufficient contacts.
No, because GreenTech Solutions does not have a physical presence in State B.
The correct answer is that State B's courts can assert personal jurisdiction over GreenTech Solutions because the company's regular business transactions with State B residents create sufficient minimum contacts with the state. Under the Due Process Clause, engaging in activities targeting the forum state can meet the requirements for personal jurisdiction even without a physical presence.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are 'minimum contacts' in the context of personal jurisdiction?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does 'personal jurisdiction' mean?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the Due Process Clause relate to personal jurisdiction?