In a criminal trial, the prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that the defendant was previously convicted of sexual misconduct. The defense objects, arguing that this evidence is inadmissible. Under the rules of evidence, which of the following is the BEST reason the prosecution can admit the defendant's prior sexual misconduct conviction?
To prove the defendant's character for truthfulness.
To establish that the defendant was present at the scene of the crime.
To demonstrate that the defendant had a motive to commit the current offense.
To show that the defendant has a general tendency to commit sexual misconduct.
The correct answer focuses on permissible purposes under Rule 404(b), which allows the introduction of prior bad acts to prove non-character related purposes such as motive, opportunity, intent, or identity. Using prior misconduct to show propensity or bad character is not allowed.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is Rule 404(b)?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does evidence of prior convictions impact a criminal trial?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the differences between permissible and impermissible uses of prior convictions?