Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

In a product liability lawsuit, the plaintiff introduces a materials scientist to testify about the failure rate of a specific alloy used in the defendant's product. The defendant argues that the scientist's testimony is outside the proper subject matter for expert witnesses. Which of the following best supports the admissibility of the materials scientist's testimony?

  • Some argue that the failure rate of the alloy is understood and not suitable for expert testimony.

  • There is an argument that the testimony relies on predictions about future failures, which could be considered speculative.

  • The materials scientist has the expertise needed to discuss the failure rate of the alloy given the specialized knowledge involved.

  • There is an argument that legal interpretation is required for discussing the failure rate of the alloy.

Multistate Bar Examination
Evidence
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot