The reliability of expert testimony is assessed using factors like whether the methodology has been tested, the subject has been peer-reviewed, and the method is generally accepted in the relevant scientific or professional community. These considerations arise from criteria established in the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. decision. The other options listed are credible principles in evaluating evidence but are not tailored to reliability in this context.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'methodology' mean in the context of expert testimony?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the Daubert standard for admissibility of expert testimony?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is 'general acceptance in the professional community' an important factor?