Jamie sells a designer handbag to Taylor, claiming it was obtained through legitimate means from a reputable store. In reality, the handbag was unlawfully taken from Jamie's friend. Taylor completed the purchase under the impression that the handbag was legally acquired. Which of the following accurately describes Taylor's potential criminal responsibility?
Taylor is charged with theft due to her intention to use the handbag without compensating the owner.
Taylor is not charged with receiving stolen goods because she proceeded under the belief that the handbag was legitimate.
Taylor is charged with receiving stolen goods despite believing the handbag was legitimately obtained.
Taylor is not charged with an offense since the transaction was between private individuals.
Taylor is not charged with receiving stolen goods because she proceeded under the belief that the handbag was legitimately obtained. Criminal liability for receiving stolen goods typically requires that the receiver knew the property was stolen. The other options incorrectly attribute liability without the necessary intent or misrepresent the nature of the crime.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does it mean to receive stolen goods?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is mens rea and how does it apply in this scenario?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the potential defenses against receiving stolen property charges?