Jane sues Bob for breach of contract in federal court. Bob believes that even if all of Jane's factual allegations are true, he has a legal defense that would absolve him of liability. He files a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56. Which of the following, if present, would BEST support Jane's opposition to Bob's motion?
Jane admits that Bob has a valid legal defense but contends that it does not apply to her case.
Jane has filed a cross-claim against Bob for related damages.
Jane has evidence showing that Bob did not perform his contractual obligations.
Bob has not responded to Jane's discovery requests.
Option A is correct because Jane presenting evidence that Bob did not perform his contractual obligations demonstrates a genuine dispute of a material fact, thereby preventing summary judgment. The other options either do not establish a material factual dispute or are unrelated to the grounds for summary judgment.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a motion for summary judgment?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does it mean to demonstrate a genuine dispute of material fact?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?