The state legislature passes a law requiring the governor to submit annual economic plans for approval by a bipartisan commission. A group of citizens argues that this law violates the separation of powers by infringing on the executive branch's authority. Which of the following best describes how a federal court should handle this dispute?
Dismiss the case as a political question, determining it is more appropriate for the legislative and executive branches to resolve.
Order the legislature to modify the law to better balance powers between the branches.
Require the governor to comply with the law while allowing the bipartisan commission to review the economic plans.
Rule in favor of the citizens, finding that the law violates the separation of powers.
The correct answer identifies that the issue presents a political question, which is not suitable for judicial resolution. Political questions are typically reserved for the other branches, and courts should abstain from deciding them.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are political questions in the context of the judiciary?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the separation of powers doctrine?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do federal courts determine if a dispute is a political question?