Judicial findings and conclusions explain the judge's evaluation of the presented evidence and application of applicable legal standards to reach a judgment. Findings of fact pertain to points of contention about the facts based on the evidence, while conclusions of law relate to how the judge applies legal principles to those facts to arrive at a ruling. Incorrect answers either mix up these roles, suggest the judge lacks independent judgment, or incorrectly define their purpose.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are findings of fact and conclusions of law?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do judicial findings and conclusions affect the appeals process?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What happens if a judge fails to provide findings and conclusions?