When multiple independent parties contribute to an indivisible injury, each party can be held liable for the entire harm caused to the plaintiff under the doctrine of joint and several liability.
This statement is correct because, under the doctrine of joint and several liability, when an indivisible injury has been caused by the concurrent actions of multiple defendants, each defendant can be held legally responsible for the full extent of the damage. The rationale is that the injury cannot be reasonably apportioned among the contributing parties. However, defendants may pursue contribution claims against each other to distribute the payment of damages equitably.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'indivisible injury' mean in the context of joint and several liability?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the doctrine of joint and several liability affect defendants in a lawsuit?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are contribution claims, and how do they work in joint and several liability cases?