Strict liability crimes do not require proof of the defendant's intent or mental state at the time of the offense. These crimes are typically enacted to enforce public safety or welfare regulations, such as traffic violations or selling alcohol to minors. The correct answer recognizes that no intent or knowledge is necessary for guilt in these cases. The other answers incorrectly suggest that some level of intent, recklessness, or awareness is required, which is inconsistent with the definition of strict liability crimes.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are some examples of strict liability crimes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does strict liability differ from other types of liability?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What public policy reasons support the use of strict liability crimes?