A political question is non-justiciable when it is textually committed to another branch of government by the Constitution or lacks judicially manageable standards for resolution. The correct answer reflects this definition. Other options are incorrect because they refer to unrelated legal doctrines or mischaracterize the requirements for justiciability. For example, standing relates to the ability of a party to demonstrate a specific injury, and mootness refers to cases where the underlying issue no longer requires resolution by a court.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does non-justiciable mean?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can you explain what it means for an issue to be 'textually committed' to another branch of government?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some examples of political questions that might be considered non-justiciable?