A large utility company is modernizing its infrastructure, anticipating tangible advantages and intangible improvements such as compliance. The sponsor requests a way to evaluate future monetary returns in today’s terms, factoring in financial considerations like interest or inflation. Which approach may best help the sponsor align projected gains with immediate value for decision-making?
A mechanism that consolidates expected returns into a single figure at the date of analysis
A model that scores intangible benefits according to organizational criteria
A technique that rates threats based on probability and severity
An approach that organizes metrics using a broad operational perspective
One approach, often referred to as net present value (NPV), shifts future forecasts into an equivalent figure at the date of analysis by applying a financial rate. This helps stakeholders compare multiple investments because it provides a monetary expression of program value now. Weighted scoring and Balanced Scorecard address additional dimensions, yet they do not convert estimated proceeds into an up-to-date currency figure. Risk ranking concentrates on the likelihood of unfavorable events rather than translating future gains.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is net present value (NPV) and how is it calculated?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some common financial rates used for discounting future cash flows?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can you explain the difference between tangible and intangible benefits in investment decisions?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
PgMP
Benefits Management
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Project Management Package Join Premium for Full Access