AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Practice Question
A company plans to move its on-premises MySQL databases to AWS. The databases are not involved in high-performance or complex transactions but require a fully managed platform that minimizes operational overhead such as hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups. Which of the following options is the MOST cost-optimized solution for their needs?
Amazon RDS for MySQL is the best answer because it offers a managed relational database service that provides a similar MySQL experience as the company's on-premises databases do. It reduces the operational overhead by handling routine database tasks such as provisioning, patching, backup, recovery, failure detection, and repair. Moreover, it's cost-effective for workloads that do not require the high performance or advanced features provided by other solutions like Amazon Aurora, which can be more expensive due to its enhanced performance capabilities.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is Amazon RDS and how does it work?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the advantages of using a managed database service like RDS?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does Amazon Aurora differ from Amazon RDS for MySQL?