An organization is implementing a new network security device that is required to actively inspect and interact with all traffic before it proceeds to the secure network areas. Due to the high-security requirement, no traffic can be allowed to pass if the device fails. Which deployment method should the organization adopt to meet its operational and security needs?
Utilize a passive setup with traffic bypass on failure
Implement an active mode with conditional traffic bypass
Monitor traffic through tap/monitor mode with automated alerting
Deploy in an active mode with a fail-closed condition
Deploying the device in an active configuration with a fail-closed setting aligns with the organization's requirement to inspect all traffic before it reaches the protected network. The 'active' configuration enables the device to interact with and control the traffic flow, making real-time decisions on whether to allow or block it. The 'fail-closed' setting ensures that if the device encounters a failure, it will cease to allow traffic to pass, upholding the stringent security policy by preventing potential threats from penetrating the network undetected. Passive configurations are inadequate in this scenario as they wouldn't actively block traffic on failure. Likewise, both tap/monitor modes and fail-open settings are contrary to the organization's requirement that all traffic must be inspected even in the event of a failure.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does it mean to deploy a network security device in active mode?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does 'fail-closed' mean in the context of network security devices?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are passive configurations not suitable for high-security environments?