CompTIA PenTest+ Practice Test (PT0-002)

The correct answer is 'Credentialed scan'. Performing credentialed scans on network devices enables deeper visibility into their configurations and potential vulnerabilities without causing the disruptions often associated with non-credentialed scans. These scans can access logs, configurations, and other details that are not available to a non-credentialed scan while reducing the chance of causing issues to the device's stability. Credentialed scans are considered best practices when allowed and possible on devices as they provide the most thorough results with fewer false positives and less operational risk to the devices being scanned.

A credentialed scan is the appropriate choice when dealing with fragile systems. This method uses valid access credentials to perform a more in-depth and safer examination of the target systems, reducing the risk of causing disruptions which may occur with more aggressive uncredentialed scans that can overwhelm sensitive systems. A non-credentialed scan can risk causing issues with fragile systems due to the more intrusive nature of the probing. A stealth scan's main purpose is to avoid detection, and while it can be less noisy on the network, it might still cause a fragile system to become unstable. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) connect scans are more intrusive as they establish a full TCP connection, potentially leading to system instability.

The primary goal of using the OSSTMM is to provide a scientific methodology for the accurate representation of operational security. The OSSTMM focuses on testing the operational security of physical locations, networks, and systems to ensure that the testing process is comprehensive and repeatable. This is important because it not only standardizes penetration testing across different environments but also ensures that the results are actionable and reliable. Option B is incorrect because, while risk management is a component of penetration testing, it is not the primary goal of the OSSTMM. Option C is incorrect because this methodology is not primarily about quantifying security spending. Option D is incorrect as its primary goal is not the generation of new security technologies.

The correct answer is false. Modern antivirus programs do not solely rely on signature-based detection. While signature-based detection is a common method that involves matching known malware signatures to files, advanced antivirus solutions also use heuristic analysis, behavioral detection, and anomaly detection to identify malicious activities or files. These methods enable antivirus programs to detect previously unknown threats and the use of penetration testing tools even when they don't match a known signature.

Using a web proxy is the correct answer because it acts as an intermediary for requests from clients seeking resources from servers. When a client makes an API request, it goes through the proxy, which allows the tester to examine and capture the request and response data. This is critical when analyzing how client and server communicate and identifying potential security issues within the API calls.

The correct answer is 'Utilize a jump box located within the client's country to conduct tests and analyze results,' because it addresses the data sovereignty issue by ensuring that any testing and resulting data remain within the country, adhering to local laws while still allowing the penetration tester to perform their duties from a remote location. Instantiating a VPN would not ensure compliance with data sovereignty as the data might transit through other jurisdictions. Encrypting all test results has merit for securing the data but doesn't prevent data from leaving the country. Testing only public-facing services may still risk violating data sovereignty laws if any resulting data is stored or analyzed outside the target country.

A router primarily operates at layer 3 (the Network layer) of the OSI model and is designed to connect multiple subnets and direct data packets between them. Routers use IP addresses to make forwarding decisions and can allow or restrict traffic between subnets. In contrast, switches typically operate at layer 2 (Data Link layer) and handle traffic within the same subnet. Hubs, being even more limited, operate at layer 1 (Physical layer) and merely replicate traffic to all ports. Firewalls, though they can restrict traffic between subnets, are not inherently responsible for allowing communication at the network layer but rather for securing the network by applying policies.

File metadata can include details such as the software used to create a document and its version, which could be exploited if the software is known to have vulnerabilities. This information can aid a penetration tester in pinpointing specific software vulnerabilities to target within an organization.

File metadata often contains information about the author, organization, document change history, and sometimes even geolocation data. Such metadata can be exposed accidentally by an organization through indexed documents and files on search engines. Strategic search engine analysis can potentially uncover this metadata. SSL certificates and social media profiles do not directly disclose internal operational details as part of their standard information. Company policies are usually general documents and do not contain the sort of specific operational details that metadata might.

When a known vulnerability is identified, the penetration tester's responsibility is to report the vulnerability to the organization in a detailed and timely manner. The report should include the impact of the vulnerability, how it was discovered, and recommended remediation steps. The penetration tester must not exploit the vulnerability without explicit authorization, as doing so can lead to legal issues and would be against the professional code of conduct. Running a proof-of-concept without permission could potentially disrupt the client's operations and would also be unethical. Ignoring the vulnerability fails the client and does not fulfill the tester's obligation.

The immediate reporting of the discovered criminal activity to the appropriate point of contact within the client organization is the best course of action because it adheres to professional and ethical standards of conduct, ensuring that potential criminal activity is addressed promptly and through the proper channels. Delaying reporting, confronting the employee directly, or discussing with peers could lead to potential complications, legal issues, or breaches of the scope of engagement and confidentiality agreements.

Vulnerability scanning tools cannot automatically adjust their scanning techniques based on the detected network topology. Penetration testers must understand the network topology and manually configure the scanning tools to ensure effective and thorough scanning. This involves selecting the appropriate scanning methods and settings that align with the network's architecture and design in order to minimize the risk of disruption and maximize the detection of potential vulnerabilities.

The Rules of Engagement document is essential as it outlines the boundaries and guidelines of the penetration test agreed upon by both the tester and the client. It includes critical details such as the timing of the tests and the specific types of tests that can be performed. This ensures legal compliance and aligns the testing activities with the client's constraints and objectives.

Reducing the speed at which the scan is carried out (Throttling the scan speed) is the best approach when dealing with bandwidth limitations. It ensures that the vulnerability scan does not consume excessive bandwidth, which could slow down the network for legitimate users or cause disruptions. It also helps avoid triggering alarms that could alert network administrators to the scan's presence. Although performing the scan during off-peak hours or using less intrusive scan types may help, they do not directly address the problem of limited bandwidth as effectively as actively managing the scan's bandwidth usage.

GDPR imposes strict rules on the processing of personal data of EU residents, including the need for explicit consent for certain actions. However, it does not specifically mandate that a company must obtain explicit consent from individuals before a penetration tester can access their personal data during a security assessment. The necessity for consent depends on the lawful basis for processing the data, and in the context of penetration testing, the lawful basis might be 'compliance with a legal obligation' or 'legitimate interests' of the company to secure its systems. It's important for penetration testers to work with legal counsel to ensure their testing activities are GDPR-compliant.